Major Scientific Reviews & Consensus Claims
This page collects broad, interdisciplinary reviews assessing scientific “consensus” on sexuality, gender, and immutability, highlighting where public messaging exceeds data.
Mayer, L. S., & McHugh, P. R. (2016). Sexuality and gender: Findings from the biological, psychological, and social sciences. The New Atlantis, (50), 7–143.
Summary: Reviews interdisciplinary research finding many public claims exceed available evidence.
Common misrepresentation: Dismissed as fringe or unscientific.
What it actually shows: Evidence review supporting nuanced exploration of sexual fluidity possibilities in therapy, without proof that change occurs for all.
Diamond, L. M., & Rosky, C. J. (2016). Scrutinizing immutability: Research on sexual orientation and U.S. legal advocacy for sexual minorities. Journal of Sex Research, 53(4–5), 363–391.
Summary: Demonstrates immutability arguments in law outrun scientific consensus, with nuanced evidence on stability and change.
Common misrepresentation: Taken to deny civil rights for sexual minorities.
What it actually shows: Scientific basis for therapeutic exploration of potential fluidity, acknowledging stability predominates without universal change guarantees.
Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash